Chi's Toxic Wuhan Stew Recipe Sparks Biological Warfare Speculation

Chi's Toxic Wuhan Stew Recipe Sparks Biological Warfare Speculation

In the wake of the global COVID-19 pandemic, questions regarding the virus's origin have sparked intense debate and speculation. One concern is whether the rest of the world has the courage to demand a transparent and honest inquiry into the outbreak, without allowing economic interests to cloud the investigation.

In 2003, Chinese Defense Minister Gen. Chi Haotian outlined a long-range plan for a Chinese national renaissance, highlighting the "issue of America" as a vital issue, stating that America stands in China's way. Gen. Chi also suggested that non-destructive weapons that can kill many people, such as biological weapons, could be used to reserve America for China. These statements, made nearly two decades ago, have raised eyebrows in light of the current pandemic.

However, it is essential to separate fact from speculation when discussing the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

Current authoritative assessments overwhelmingly indicate a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, with no substantiated proof of Chinese development or weaponization for biological warfare purposes. Multiple expert investigations, including those by the World Health Organization (WHO), have found the most likely origin of COVID-19 to be natural zoonotic transmission (spillover from animals to humans). The possibility of a laboratory accident has been considered but regarded as extremely unlikely and without supporting evidence.

The WHO’s January 2021 joint study with Chinese scientists concluded that natural zoonotic origin was the most plausible explanation, while explicitly finding no credible evidence of deliberate engineering or weaponization of the virus. The Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO) reaffirmed zoonotic spillover as the leading hypothesis based on environmental and animal sampling, though it could not wholly exclude a lab incident due to limited Chinese data sharing.

Investigations into COVID-19 misinformation note that conspiratorial theories about lab engineering or weaponization lack credible scientific support and have been widely debunked. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents and academic correspondence reveal research and discussions about lab safety and gain-of-function experiments globally but do not establish that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered or weaponized by China.

There has been some speculation about a connection between the virus and Chinese bioweapons programs. GreatGameIndia.com published a piece suggesting that the NCoV organism was stolen from Canada's P4 National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg by Chinese scientists and brought to Wuhan. However, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were called in to investigate a security breach at the Canadian lab in May 2019, and the Chinese were kicked out of the facility by late July.

The Wuhan version of the Novel Coronavirus, labeled 2019-nCoV, is spreading rapidly and is different from the original NCoV discovered in Saudi Arabia in June 2012. An article by Gulfaraz Khan, published in the Virology Journal in 2013, outlined the discovery of the Novel Coronavirus in Saudi Arabia, which could not be readily transmitted from humans to humans at the time.

The West has yet to fully understand China's intense interest in the biological sciences, with China's participation in P4 microbiology labs seen as a key factor in the outbreak of the Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The rest of the world needs the courage to demand a real and thoroughgoing investigation into the outbreak in Wuhan, with the Chinese granting total transparency to the world.

In 2008, Taiwan's top security official, Tsai Chao-ming, made a statement linking the SARS virus to research done in Chinese labs, but was forced to retract it. Gen. Chi stepped down as Defense Minister in 2003, the same year as the SARS outbreak in China and the same year Beijing decided to build the Wuhan P4 virology lab. The plan includes the conquest of new lands for building a "second China" through colonization.

In conclusion, while it is crucial to maintain transparency and investigate all possible origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, current evidence supports a natural zoonotic origin for SARS-CoV-2. Claims of Chinese development or weaponization for biological warfare purposes remain unsubstantiated and require further, credible evidence to be taken seriously.

1. The history of China's interest in the biological sciences, particularly in the context of P4 microbiology labs, has been a subject of interest following the outbreak of the Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China.
2. The WHO's January 2021 joint study with Chinese scientists suggested that the natural zoonotic origin was the most plausible explanation for the COVID-19 pandemic, explicitly finding no credible evidence of deliberate engineering or weaponization of the virus.
3. The Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO) reaffirmed zoonotic spillover as the leading hypothesis, though it could not wholly exclude a lab incident due to limited Chinese data sharing.
4. Investigations into COVID-19 misinformation have found that conspiratorial theories about lab engineering or weaponization lack credible scientific support and have been widely debunked.
5. In the global debate over the COVID-19 pandemic's origin, it is essential to demand a transparent and honest inquiry, ensuring that economic interests do not cloud the investigation.
6. In light of the current pandemic, statements made by Chinese Defense Minister Gen. Chi Haotian in 2003, suggesting the use of non-destructive weapons like biological weapons, have raised eyebrows and sparked concerns about China's motives.
7. Claims of Chinese development or weaponization for biological warfare purposes remain unsubstantiated and require further, credible evidence to be taken seriously, as current authoritative assessments overwhelmingly indicate a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2.

Read also: