Two scientific entities affirm their continued efforts in shaping the U.S. climate evaluation.
Unraveling the Climate Change Quagmire: What's Next for the National Climate Assessment?
The Trump administration's recent dismissal of hundreds of scientists working on the National Climate Assessment (NCA) has sent shockwaves through the scientific community. Here's what's at stake:
The Impact of Mass Dimissals
- This move by the administration has disrupted the progress of the NCA, bolstering speculations that the U.S. Global Change Research Program is undergoing a transformation consistent with the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025.
- Reactions from the Experts: The scientific community, predictably, braces for the potential consequences of this decision. Many experts are advocating for an evidence-based independent continuation of the report [1].
The Future of NCA: A Cloudy Outlook
- With the release of the sixth NCA scheduled for late 2027 or early 2028, the report faces significant uncertainties. The administration might opt for a truncated version or present less stringent or misleading data, such as downplaying fossil fuels' role in climate change [2].
- Legalities and Red Tape: While Congress has the legal authority to terminate the NCA, the administration could manipulate the process by altering the report's scope or methodology [2].
Independent Foray: Can it Work?
- Past Precedents: Earlier this year, the Trump administration halted work on the National Nature Assessment, but the authors pressed on with independent publication. However, due to its scale and complexity, the NCA presents a more formidable challenge for independent efforts [2].
- Practical Challenges: The intricate coordination and sheer amount of work required for the NCA make it difficult for a small, volunteer-led team to effectively carry on without federal support [2].
But the scientific spirit is resilient. As one civil engineer at Carnegie Mellon University stated, "This effort cannot replace NCA6, but it gives author teams an opportunity to complete and publish their work, reminding us all that science is unstoppable" [1].
© 2025 The New York Times Company
Additional Insights:
The Trump administration's dismissal of NCA scientists follows a pattern of efforts to undermine federal climate science [1]. The administration's goal, as outlined by the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, is to reshape federal climate science research to better align with President Trump's climate skepticism [1][2]. Simultaneously, the administration has also sought to cut research funding at various federal agencies, including the National Science Foundation, which has supported NCA work [1][2].
- Despite the dismissal of hundreds of scientists working on the National Climate Assessment (NCA), the scientific community remains hopeful, advocating for an independent, evidence-based continuation of the report.
- Facing significant uncertainties, the upcoming sixth NCA report might be presented in a truncated form or with less stringent or misleading data, such as downplaying fossil fuels' role in climate change.
- The Trump administration might manipulate the process of the NCA's release by altering its scope or methodology, leveraging legalities and red tape.
- Independent efforts, while not a replacement for NCA6, can provide an opportunity for authors to complete and publish their work, reminding us all that science is unstoppable.
- The mounting challenge posed by the Trump administration's climate change skepticism and undermining of federal climate science calls for a review of environmental-science policies and a strengthening of health-and-wellness initiatives to address the realities of climate change in the years leading up to 2025 and beyond.
